PERA Receives Clean Audit at 2025 Legislative Audit Committee Hearing

Colorado PERA received a clean audit at its annual hearing with the Legislative Audit Committee on August 11.

Results of annual audit

Every year, the State hires an independent auditor to examine PERA’s financial reports, compliance, and internal controls. Since 2015, the State has enlisted CliftonLarsonAllen, a nationally recognized financial services firm, to conduct that work.

As in years past, the audit did not find any issues with PERA’s recently released 2024 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and did not find any deficiencies or weaknesses in PERA’s internal controls.

Ensuring robust and accurate financial reporting and internal controls is a vital part of providing retirement security to Colorado’s public workforce. To that end, the ACFR is prepared to conform with generally accepted accounting principles, including requirements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board and Actuarial Standards of Practice. PERA’s internal audit team routinely reviews internal controls and operations, and the Chief Audit Executive regularly reports to the Board of Trustees’ Audit Committee, which includes independent experts.

RELATED: A Closer Look at PERA’s 2024 Annual Report

PERA plan study

In addition to the outside audit, the hearing included the Office of the State Auditor presenting the results of an independent study that compared the cost and benefits of the PERA Defined Benefit Plan to other plan designs.

That study found PERA continues to be a valuable tool for recruiting and retaining public employees by providing cost-effective retirement benefits.

READ MORE: Study Confirms PERA a Valuable Tool for Recruiting, Retaining Public Workers

Other interim activities

While PERA staff and consultants typically meet with various other legislative panels throughout the summer, those hearings are paused this year due to budget constraints. The suspension of interim activities applies to both the Pension Review Commission, which typically begins working on bills for the next legislative session, and the Pension Review Subcommittee.

PERA’s next hearing at the State Capitol will be with the Joint Budget Committee in the fall.

What the One Big Beautiful Bill Act Means for Retiree Health Care

President Trump signed into law the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” a bill that makes changes to federal taxes and spending, some of which could affect older Americans receiving government assistance for food and health care.

The bill includes new tax provisions, such as a $6,000 tax deduction for seniors and expanded deductions for charitable giving. It also reduces government spending on programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), as well as the individual insurance marketplace created by the Affordable Care Act.

Those changes could affect some people with disabilities, family caregivers, retirees who are not yet old enough to qualify for Medicare, and others who shop for health insurance on their own. The bill does not directly affect Medicare or Medicare Advantage plans like what PERACare offers.

Health and food assistance programs

According to AARP, more than 11 million Americans age 50 and older rely on SNAP benefits to afford their groceries and more than 17 million older adults use Medicaid for their health care. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act will make it harder to qualify for both programs and will require more paperwork for some enrollees to continue receiving their benefits.

To qualify for Medicaid, people under the age of 65 will need to show that they’re working or taking part in other job-related activities, such as job training or volunteering, at least 80 hours a month, unless they qualify for an exception. States also will be required to verify some enrollees’ eligibility more often—at least every six months.

The bill also expands work requirements for SNAP food assistance to include more older Americans. Able-bodied adults under the age of 65 will have to work at least 20 hours a week to receive benefits for more than three months, unless they qualify for an exception.

Medicaid work requirements are expected to take effect by early 2027, but it’s less clear when the new SNAP requirements will go into effect.

The individual insurance marketplace

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act adds new requirements for enrolling in health care coverage through insurance marketplaces like Connect for Health Colorado.

The bill eliminates automatic reenrollment in marketplace health care plans, meaning participants in those plans will need to manually enroll every year or face losing their coverage. It also shortens the annual open enrollment period and allows the expiration of enhanced tax credits that made plans more affordable.

Experts say premiums for marketplace insurance plans are likely to go up as a result of the changes, and insurers in Colorado have already proposed substantial increases for next year.

Coverage options under PERACare

PERA’s health benefits program, PERACare, includes pre-Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans, as well as combination coverage for retirees who want to cover both Medicare and non-Medicare eligible family members.

PERA provides a health care subsidy to help offset PERACare health care premiums. The subsidy amount is based upon a retiree’s years of service, for a maximum $115 monthly subsidy for Medicare-eligible retirees.

While the federal tax and spending bill does not include changes to Medicare, other regulatory changes (among other factors) are expected to influence plan premiums next year. PERA staff are still finalizing plan details, but we do expect PERACare premiums to rise for 2026.

PERACare open enrollment will take place between October 20 and November 20, 2025, and we will have plan information available by October 1.

For more information, visit copera.org/peracare.

Colorado Legislature Passes Four PERA-Related Bills in 2025 Session

Editor’s note (6-10-25): This article was updated to show that all four bills have been signed into law.


That’s a wrap on the 2025 legislative session—the Colorado General Assembly concluded on Wednesday, May 7.

Lawmakers introduced more than 650 bills over the course of the 120-day session, seven of which related directly to PERA. Of those, four bills passed both chambers and are now on the governor’s desk. Below are summaries of those four bills and their impact on PERA.

Visit our legislation tracking page for more information on these bills and the bills that didn’t pass.

Which bills passed?

Senate Bill 28: Public Employees’ Retirement Association Risk Reduction Measures

This bill establishes in state law certain reporting practices the PERA Board of Trustees already performs on a regular basis, including actuarial experience studies and independent reviews through actuarial audits. The bill aims to align the timeline of those activities with the Pension Review Subcommittee’s independent review, which it conducts on a regular basis.

House Bill 1105: PERA True-Up of Denver Public Schools Division Employer Contribution

Legislation that merged the Denver Public Schools Retirement System (DPSRS) into PERA in 2010 included a requirement that PERA perform a “true-up” calculation every five years to determine if the Denver Public Schools (DPS) Division’s employer contribution rate should be adjusted to ensure the DPS and School Divisions reach equal funding ratios within 30 years.

This bill reduces the DPS Division employer contribution rate by 3.0%, diverts a portion of the DPS Division’s Health Care Trust Fund contributions towards the DPS Division’s Pension Trust Fund, temporarily removes the DPS Division from the Automatic Adjustment Provision calculation (though it remains subject to any changes from the AAP) and temporarily prevents the DPS Division from receiving allocations of the annual direct distribution from the State in order to negate the impact of the reduced contributions having a negative effect on the AAP calculation.

Senate Bill 147: Modify Board Management PERA

This bill modifies a number of provisions under current law related to the PERA Board, including changes to how PERA is designated for purposes of open meetings laws, establishing term limits for Trustees, and requiring that certain financial information, including various administrative costs and other expenses, be posted on PERA’s website and updated on an annual basis.

READ MORE: PERA Board Supports Bill That Codifies Board Practices, Enhances Transparency

Senate Bill 310: Proposition 130 Implementation

The final PERA-related bill introduced this session involved Proposition 130, the voter-approved measure that directs the state to spend $350 million to recruit, train, and retain local law enforcement officers. The provisions that apply to PERA relate to funding for the bill, which will involve giving PERA a lump-sum payment of $500 million on July 1, 2025 and reducing future years’ direct distributions to PERA based on our investment earnings on the $500 million.

Despite reductions in future direct distributions, the bill is expected to be a net positive for PERA’s funding and also allows PERA to allocate the $500 million in a way that reduces the likelihood of triggering the AAP based on PERA’s funding progress in the future.

What’s next?

Gov. Jared Polis signed all four PERA-related bills into law.

In addition to the above bills, the Legislature passed Senate Bill 199, which suspends interim legislative activities for the year. That means the Pension Review Commission and Pension Review Subcommittee, which usually meet in the period between sessions and begin work on drafting legislation, will not meet this summer. PERA staff will still appear before the Legislative Audit Committee in August to discuss our financial status and receive the results of the State’s annual audit.

Last session, the Legislature approved a bill that directs the Office of the State Auditor to commission an updated study comparing the value of PERA’s hybrid defined benefit plan to other plan designs. We expect to receive the results of that study sometime this summer, and we’ll be sure to share that information when we have it.

PERA Board Supports Bill That Codifies Board Practices, Enhances Transparency

The Colorado PERA Board of Trustees voted to support SB25-147, a bill that proposes changes to statute regarding Board operations and transparency. The Trustees held a special meeting on Friday, February 28 to discuss the bill and take a position.

The bill from sponsors Sen. Byron Pelton, Sen. Chris Kolker, Rep. Lori Garcia Sander, and Rep. Meghan Lukens would modify state law to impose term limits on Trustees; define the PERA Board as a local public body instead of a state public body as it applies to the Colorado Open Meetings Law; and require that PERA post certain financial information online, including staff compensation and various other administrative expenses.

In addition to the above changes, the bill sets out in state law some current Board and staff practices, including:

  • Posting Board meeting materials and recordings on PERA’s website: PERA currently streams every Board meeting on copera.org and YouTube, and recordings are available afterward. Agendas for Board meetings are posted in advance and materials from past meetings are also available online.
  • Providing instructions for members of the public to participate in Board meetings: PERA currently provides multiple ways to communicate with the Board, including public comment (in person and over the phone) at every regular meeting and a Board-specific email address on the Contact Us page.
  • Posting audited financial statements online: PERA’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) contains detailed information about PERA’s finances, membership, and operations. The ACFR and all other annual financial reports are available online.

In their conversation about the bill and its proposed changes, Trustees discussed the importance of transparency in maintaining trust with stakeholders. The Board’s vote to support the bill demonstrates its commitment to making PERA more open and accountable.

“Strong governance and clear communication with our members and the public are vital to a mission-driven organization like Colorado PERA, and we believe Senate Bill 147 helps affirm our commitment to transparency,” said CEO/Executive Director Andrew Roth. “I want to thank the sponsors for bringing this bill before the Legislature, and we look forward to further engagement with policymakers as it makes its way through the General Assembly.”

On February 25, the Senate Finance Committee voted unanimously to refer the amended bill to Appropriations, where it remains under consideration.

Learn more and read the full text of the bill on the General Assembly’s website.

2025 Proposed PERA-Related Legislation Status

The 2025 legislative session commenced January 8 and concluded May 7.

Below you’ll find summaries of proposed legislation affecting Colorado PERA. The status of each bill will be updated regularly.

Last updated: June 4, 2025


SB25-028

Public Employees’ Retirement Association Risk-Reduction Measures

Summary: Codifies into state law certain reporting practices the PERA Board already performs on a regular basis and modifies the cadence of those reports, including actuarial experience studies and independent reviews of actuarial audits.

Sponsors: Rep. Eliza Hamrick, Rep. Rick Taggart, Sen. Chris Kolker

Status: Passed; Gov. Jared Polis signed into law Feb. 26.

HB25-1052

Income Tax Credit for Public Employees’ Retirement Association Retirees

Summary: Creates a temporary refundable tax credit of $700 for qualifying PERA retirees. To qualify, a retiree would have to be 65 or older at the end of tax year 2025 or 2026, and have annual gross income of no more than $38,000 for single tax filers or $76,000 for joint filers.

Sponsors: Rep. Eliza Hamrick, Rep. Rick Taggart, Sen. Chris Kolker

Status: House Finance Committee voted to postpone indefinitely Jan. 27.

HB25-1105

PERA True-Up of Denver Public Schools Division Employer Contribution

Summary: Would reduce the total employer contribution rate for the Denver Public Schools Division from 10.4% to 7.4% of salary beginning July 1, 2025.

Sponsors: Rep. Sean Camacho

Status: Passed; Gov. Polis signed into law May 23.

HB25-1150

Forfeiture of PERA Benefits by Sex Offenders

Summary: Requires a PERA member to forfeit part of their retirement benefits should that individual be convicted of a sex crime. It would also establish a new fund into which forfeited benefits would be transferred and these monies would be used to provide grants to survivors of a sex crime for necessary medical and mental health resources.

Sponsors: Rep. Ron Weinberg

Status: House Finance Committee voted to postpone indefinitely Feb. 24.

SB25-147

Modify Board Management PERA

Summary: Would modify a number of provisions under current law related to the PERA Board of Trustees, including changes to how PERA is designated for purposes of open meetings laws, establishing term limits for Trustees, and requiring that certain financial information, including various administrative costs and other expenses, be posted on PERA’s website and updated on an annual basis.

Sponsors: Sen. Byron Pelton, Sen. Chris Kolker, Rep. Lori Garcia Sander, Rep. Meghan Lukens

Status: Passed; Gov. Polis signed into law June 3.

SB25-136

Expand Deduction for Retirement Benefits

Summary: For tax years commencing on or after Jan. 1, 2026, would remove all caps on the deduction for amounts received as pensions and annuities from the individual’s federal taxable income when determining the individual’s state taxable income.

Sponsors: Sen. Byron Pelton, Rep. Ryan Gonzalez

Status: Senate State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Committee voted to postpone indefinitely Feb. 27.

SB25-310

Proposition 130 Implementation

Summary: Would implement and modify Proposition 130, approved by voters in the November 2024 general election, which directs the state to spend $350 million to help recruit, train, and retain local law enforcement officers. The provisions concerning PERA relate to funding for the bill, which would involve giving PERA a lump-sum payment of $500 million on July 1, 2025. Those funds are to be invested and based on the earnings there may be reductions made to the statutorily required direct distributions to PERA in future years in order to provide funding to the public safety fund.

Sponsors: Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer, Sen. Jeff Bridges, Rep. Shannon Bird, Rep. Rick Taggart

Status: Passed; Gov. Polis signed into law June 2.

Checking in on the 2025 Legislative Session So Far

The 2025 legislative session is well underway with more than 400 bills introduced so far.

To hear the latest from the State Capitol, we caught up with PERA Director of Public & Government Affairs Michael Steppat, who meets regularly with lawmakers throughout the legislative process.

Let’s start with a quick recap of the PERA-related bills we’ve seen so far and where they stand.

So far this session, legislators have introduced six bills that affect PERA or our members. One of those bills—which reintroduced last year’s bill to create a temporary tax credit for retirees—has already been defeated in committee.

The five bills that remain under consideration touch on a variety of topics. For example, SB25-136 would remove the state income tax deduction limit on pension income, and HB25-1150 would require a PERA member who’s convicted of a sex crime to forfeit part of their benefits.

Two of the bills—SB25-028 and SB25-147—propose changes to state law that in many cases codify work PERA and the PERA Board are already doing. That includes things such as financial studies and reporting, video streaming Board meetings and posting meeting materials online. As a mission-driven organization, transparency is important to the work we do, and we appreciate working with the Legislature to ensure all stakeholders have the information they need.

READ MORE: 2025 Proposed PERA-Related Legislation Status

Writing the State’s budget is always an important part of the legislative session; how’s that process going this year?

Lawmakers began the session with a challenging budget situation—a shortfall of nearly $700 million. There have also been some questions about whether anything in Washington, DC will affect the hundreds of millions of dollars Colorado receives from the federal government. Throughout the budget writing process, lawmakers are keeping a close eye on any potential impacts to the state budget.

The Legislature will release its budget proposal, known as the “long bill,” in March and finalize it in April. While the state budget doesn’t determine PERA’s budget or the payment of benefits, we’ll keep an eye out for anything that might affect PERA or PERA employers down the line.

Do any of the changes in the federal government, such as staffing reductions and spending freezes, affect PERA?

PERA does not receive federal funding and so far, none of the changes in the federal government have any direct impact on PERA. All of our funding comes from employee and employer contributions, investment returns, and an annual $225 million direct distribution from the state. PERA benefits are paid from the PERA trust funds and are not subject to federal funding or programs.

The Colorado General Assembly created PERA and remains in charge of things like benefit provisions and legislative oversight. While the federal government has limited jurisdiction over public retirement plans like PERA, it does oversee other benefits PERA members and retirees may receive, such as Medicare and Social Security.

Speaking of Social Security, what’s the latest on the Social Security Fairness Act and the repeal of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO)?

Since the Social Security Fairness Act became law in early January, the Social Security Administration (SSA) has been working to figure out how it will implement all the necessary changes and recalculate retiree benefits. That could take some time under the best of circumstances, since it’s a complicated issue with millions of affected beneficiaries.

The SSA said it’s been under a hiring freeze since November so it’s working with limited staff, and that’s likely to cause a delay in implementing the law. If we see further reductions in the SSA workforce, it’s possible the delay could stretch even further. Only time will tell, and we’re keeping an eye out for any updates or developments from SSA.

READ MORE: Social Security Fairness Act Rollout Could Take A Year or More

What’s the best way to stay up to date throughout the session?

We post regular updates here on PERA On The Issues, so subscribing to the biweekly newsletter is a great way to receive the latest news in your inbox. The legislative session will run through early May, and we’ll be sure to let everyone know about any new bills that come up between now and then.

President Biden Signs WEP/GPO Repeal Bill into Law

Social Security’s Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) will soon be no more.

After legislators took historic action to pass the Social Security Fairness Act in the final hours of Congress in late December, President Joe Biden signed the bill into law on Sunday, Jan. 5.

It’s now up to the Social Security Administration to begin implementing the changes.

Why it matters

The bill removes from federal law Social Security’s WEP and GPO, two provisions that can significantly reduce Social Security benefits for retirees who also receive retirement income from work that wasn’t covered by Social Security. In Colorado, most public employees do not contribute to Social Security and therefore faced reductions to any earned Social Security benefits under WEP and GPO if they or their spouse contributed to Social Security before or after their public sector employment.

Lawmakers had been trying for decades to remove or modify WEP and GPO, but those bills never made it to the floor of the House or Senate for a vote. The passage of the Social Security Fairness Act in 2024 marks a historic change; removing those two provisions means the public employees affected by them will no longer receive reduced Social Security benefits.

As written, the bill’s changes are effective for Social Security benefits payable starting in 2024 and beyond.

What does repeal mean for PERA members?

At this early stage, there are still a lot of questions about how the bill will be implemented. The Social Security Administration has not yet released any details on when or how any changes might take place. Visit ssa.gov for the latest information from the Social Security Administration.

It’s important to note the repeal of WEP and GPO does not affect a PERA retiree’s PERA benefit; the changes only apply to Social Security benefits. Any questions about Social Security benefits should be directed to the Social Security Administration.

Throughout the legislative process, much of the debate on the bill had to do with its cost—the Congressional Budget Office estimates it will require nearly $200 billion in additional spending over the next decade to provide larger Social Security benefits to those affected by WEP and GPO. That additional cost could also accelerate the depletion of the Social Security trust funds, which may add urgency to legislative efforts to shore up the program.

PERA On The Issues will continue to closely monitor this issue and provide updates when available. Be sure to subscribe to our biweekly newsletter and follow Colorado PERA on social media (we’re on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn) for the latest information.

What to Expect from the 2025 Legislative Session

State lawmakers convened at the Capitol Building in Denver on January 8 to begin the 75th Colorado General Assembly. Over the course of 120 days, legislators will introduce and debate hundreds of bills that could become law.

As in past legislative sessions, a handful of those bills will be related to PERA and its members. We caught up with PERA Director of Public & Government Affairs Michael Steppat ahead of the new session to get his perspective on what to expect.

What role does the State Legislature play in PERA?

While the PERA Board of Trustees is responsible for administering benefits and overseeing PERA’s investments, the Colorado General Assembly is responsible for many other aspects of PERA, such as contribution rates, benefit levels, providing oversight through various legislative committees, and setting the amount of the annual benefit increases that retirees receive.

It’s important to make sure lawmakers understand how PERA works and how legislation can potentially affect our funding progress. The majority of time spent in the weeks leading up to the start of the new session involves meeting with legislators and other stakeholders on PERA-related issues and potential legislation for the upcoming session.

How does the recent election impact PERA?

Due to term limits for state legislators in Colorado and just natural turnover, the previous election cycle and futures cycles include many individuals being elected for the very first time. This means it is an ongoing process to educate lawmakers on PERA-related issues. As is the case with most public policy issues, there are very few who are experts right out of the gate in every aspect of an issue and this is especially true with a state retirement system. There will certainly be incoming lawmakers with experience in finance or investments or actuarial science, but it is not common for someone to have experience in all aspects of a pension plan like PERA.

A primary focus, both year-round and following a recent election, is to meet with and educate lawmakers. To get a good sense of how quickly the state legislature turns over, just look at how many legislators are still part of the General Assembly who voted on Senate Bill 200 in 2018—it’s fewer than a dozen out of 100 total legislators.

We already have an idea of some of the PERA-related legislative issues lawmakers will be looking at this year. Can you tell us more about that?

Legislative work doesn’t only happen while the General Assembly is in session—throughout the summer and fall, various “interim” (the period when the legislature is not in regular session) committees meet and begin work on studying issues and drafting bills for the next session. This past September, the Pension Review Commission drafted two bills related to PERA.

The first, known as Bill A (until it is given a bill number after being officially introduced), is identical to a bill from last session that would provide a temporary tax credit for PERA retirees to reduce the impact of inflation. The second, Bill B, would codify into state law certain reporting practices the PERA Board already performs on a regular basis and would modify the cadence of those reports.

READ MORE: State Lawmakers Pursuing Two PERA-Related Bills in 2025

In addition, there’s been discussion at the Capitol regarding a potential ”conversion” of the State’s share of Pinnacol Assurance, which is currently the State’s workers’ compensation insurer, after the proposal was included as part of the Governor’s budget request to the General Assembly last month. The proposed conversion has two main aspects related to PERA that were both included in the budget request. The first is that if Pinnacol becomes a private entity, then it cannot continue to be part of PERA both for current and future employees, and it would have to disaffiliate from PERA. The second involves using the proceeds from the sale of Pinnacol to offset the State’s $225m ‘direct distribution’ payment to PERA in future years.

Aside from PERA-related topics, what are some other legislative priorities lawmakers will likely be pursuing this year?

A top priority for the Legislature this session will be coming up with a balanced budget. When Gov. Jared Polis submitted his budget proposal to the Joint Budget Committee, it included nearly $700 million in cuts to fill a projected funding gap. The Legislature ultimately develops the State budget, and they may have different ideas for how to make up the shortage, so we’ll be closely monitoring as that process plays out to see if there are implications to PERA.

It is important to note PERA benefits come out of the trust funds reserved for paying those benefits, which are funded through contributions from employees and their employers as well as investment returns.

At the federal level, a new Congress is just getting underway. What can we expect in Washington, DC?

The beginning of the year will be busy for Congress. The House and Senate convened on January 3, and President Trump will be sworn in for his second term on January 20. Then, Congress will begin confirmation hearings for Trump’s various nominees. With Republicans controlling the White House and both chambers of Congress, we can expect to see the party try to push through many of its legislative priorities on issues such as immigration, trade, and regulation. One policy issue at the federal level which does often impact PERA more than many others is changes to healthcare policy and we will continue to monitor what, if any, proposals come forward in that respect.

In the final days of the last Congress, legislators took the historic step of approving a bill to repeal Social Security’s Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO), and President Biden has since signed the bill into law. What’s the latest on that issue?

Congress had been trying to repeal or modify WEP and GPO for decades without success, but the political environment was just right to make it happen at the end of 2024. We were encouraged to see legislators take action to improve the retirement security of public employees and we’ll be watching closely to see how the repeal of those two federal provisions unfolds.

There’s still a lot we don’t know at this point—it’s unclear what the implementation of the Social Security Fairness Act will look like, and the Social Security Administration has yet to release any details. As written the bill should apply to Social Security benefits paid in 2024, so some retirees may be owed additional benefit payments, but we don’t yet know when that might happen.

What do you recommend to anyone who wants to get involved in the legislative process?

I always tell people the most important thing they can do is contact their legislators about issues that are important to them. In addition, the General Assembly website has lots of great information. You can listen to committee meetings, view calendars, review the status of a bill, and sign up to testify at committee meetings.

And of course the biweekly PERA On The Issues newsletter will have up-to-date information on any legislation that affects PERA.

U.S. House Passes WEP/GPO Repeal Bill, Heads to Senate

UPDATE (Jan. 7, 2025): Pres. Joe Biden has signed the Social Security Fairness Act into law. We posted an updated article here.

UPDATE (Dec. 30, 2024): The U.S. Senate on Dec. 21 voted to pass the Social Security Fairness Act. The bill now awaits President Biden’s signature.

UPDATE (Dec. 13, 2024): Colorado PERA and the Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado sent a joint letter to Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper, encouraging them to support the Social Security Fairness Act in the Senate. Read the letter.


In a historic first, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to pass a bill that aims to repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO), which can reduce Social Security benefits for Colorado PERA members and other public employees.

The bill, H.R. 82—also known as the Social Security Fairness Act—was introduced in early January 2023 and eventually gained the support of over 300 cosponsors on both sides of the aisle. Lawmakers didn’t take any significant action on the bill until September 2024, when sponsors Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) and Garret Graves (R-LA) filed what’s known as a discharge petition, seeking to move the bill out of committee and force a floor vote.

Despite an Election Day maneuver seeking to table the bill, House leadership put H.R. 82 to a vote on Tuesday, November 12. It passed by a vote of 327 to 75.

The bill’s fate now lies with the Senate as lawmakers have just days to pass legislation before the current Congress ends. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has said he intends to bring the bill up for a vote.

Some lawmakers have expressed concern about the bill’s cost; a recent estimate from the Congressional Budget Office found it would require nearly $200 billion in additional spending over the next decade to provide larger Social Security benefits to those affected.

What are WEP and GPO?

Social Security benefits are designed to replace only some of a worker’s pre-retirement earnings, and lower-paid workers receive a larger replacement percentage than higher-paid workers. Prior to the WEP being enacted in 1983, non-Social Security government workers like PERA members would receive a larger-than-intended Social Security benefit because of those years in their earning record when they weren’t contributing to Social Security. The WEP was meant to remove that advantage.

The GPO applies to PERA retirees who also receive a Social Security spousal or widow(er) benefit and reduces the Social Security benefit by two-thirds of the PERA benefit. That’s because spousal and widow(er) benefits are considered “dependent” benefits and were meant to help spouses who stayed at home and depended on their working partner for financial support. According to the Social Security Administration, now that it is common for both spouses to work, the GPO requires the “dependent” benefit to be offset by the dollar amount of their own retirement benefit.

It’s important to note that a retiree’s PERA benefit will never be reduced to Social Security or other benefits. Learn more about PERA and Social Security.

Federal lawmakers also voted on another WEP-related bill, H.R. 5342, which would have introduced a new formula for calculating Social Security benefit reductions rather than a full repeal. That bill failed on a vote of 175 to 225.

PERA On The Issues will continue to monitor legislation on this issue and we’ll post updates when available. Be sure to subscribe to our biweekly newsletter to stay informed.

State Lawmakers Pursuing Two PERA-Related Bills in 2025

Lawmakers in Colorado are moving forward with two PERA-related bill drafts following a summer of legislative activity in interim committees.

PERA leaders and staff have been meeting with legislators throughout the summer to provide updates, answer questions, and provide feedback during this annual period of PERA review and oversight.

Drafts of PERA-related bills

The Pension Review Commission, which is responsible for recommending legislation pertaining to PERA and the Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, met on Friday, September 27 to finalize two bill drafts related to PERA.

The first, known as Bill A, is similar to a bill from last session that would provide a temporary tax credit for PERA retirees to reduce the impact of inflation. The $700 credit would apply to retirees who are at least 65 years old and have adjusted gross income of no more than $38,000 for single filers or $76,000 for joint filers.

The second draft, Bill B, pertains to PERA studies and reporting. The bill aims to lay out in statute some of the work the PERA Board already does on a regular basis, such as periodic actuarial audits and actuarial experience studies. The bill also would modify the cadence of those reports.

The Commission had been considering a bill to tie to inflation the State’s annual $225 million direct distribution to PERA, based on a recommendation from the Pension Review Subcommittee. Lawmakers decided not to move forward with that bill as one of their official interim committee-recommended pieces of legislation because of its added cost amid a projected shortfall in the state budget. Lawmakers may still decide individually to move forward with any particular bills during the legislative session.

Pension Review Subcommittee recommendations

Throughout the summer, PERA also engaged with the Pension Review Subcommittee, which consists of a mix of legislators and members of the public and reports up to the Pension Review Commission. In addition to making recommendations to the Pension Review Commission, the Subcommittee also makes recommendations to the PERA Board and writes an annual letter to the residents of Colorado on PERA’s financial health.

In the course of its work, the Pension Review Subcommittee came up with three recommendations for the PERA Board:

  1. Provide more detail on the benchmarks PERA uses to measure performance of the various asset classes in the PERA Defined Benefit Plan portfolio.
  2. Improve transparency around PERA Board meetings by making meeting recordings and materials more easily accessible online.
  3. Study the impact of allowing non-vested PERA members who refund their account to receive their balance plus investment returns instead of the current Board-established 3% compounding interest.

The PERA Board discussed the recommendations at its September Planning Session and agreed to consider all three. Investment staff provided the Subcommittee with the information requested on benchmarks, the Board agreed to archive meeting recordings and public materials online starting in November; meetings are currently streamed live and available upon request. The Board also agreed staff will study the cost of providing market returns when a member refunds their account.

What’s next?

All bill drafts from interim committees go to the Legislative Council Committee for consideration. If approved, lawmakers can then introduce those bills in the next legislative session, which begins on January 8, 2025.

The PERA Board’s next regularly scheduled meeting is set for November 15.