PERA Earned 7.3 Percent Return in 2016

Conversation about PERA’s long-term financial health ongoing

Colorado PERA announced a 7.3 percent investment return, according to its 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) released last week. The total fund—the combined assets of all five PERA member divisions—has now matched or outperformed the policy benchmark set by the PERA Board of Trustees for the one-, three-, five-, and 10-year time periods, net of fees. The long-term investment return for 35 years is 9.8 percent, gross of fees. (For more information on the Board’s responsibilities, including how it oversees PERA’s investment program, see this PERA on the Issues post.)

Those who have been following along with this year’s PERAtour effort are likely aware that the PERA Board and staff are currently soliciting feedback from PERA members, retirees, employers, and the general public on ways to help reduce PERA’s overall risk profile going forward. In 2016, the PERA Board lowered the long-term investment return assumption to 7.25 percent from 7.5 percent, reflecting their expectations for future market performance. Additionally, the Board conducted an experience study which showed that PERA members are living longer—meaning that PERA must pay benefits for a longer period of time than previously expected. The numbers reported in this year’s CAFR reflect these changes.

PERA is required by statute to undergo an annual financial audit overseen by the Office of the State Auditor, and conducted by an external audit firm. On June 22, 2017, the external auditor, CliftonLarsonAllen, reported to the PERA Board’s Audit Committee that they anticipate an unmodified “clean” opinion that the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, for the seventh straight year.

In addition to the annual financial audit, the CAFR has consistently been recognized by the Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA) for excellence in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting. PERA’s CAFR received this recognition for the 31st straight year in 2016. PERA’s annual CAFR is a wealth of vital information regarding the fund, including details on financial, investment, actuarial, and statistical facts. Below is an infographic highlighting some of the important pieces of information that can be found within the report.

Asset Class In-Depth: Equities

With over $45 billion in assets, the Investment team at Colorado PERA, guided by the PERA Board of Trustees’ investment policies, seeks the highest investment return for an appropriate level of risk. The team pursues this goal through a well-diversified portfolio of assets, where diversification helps to smooth the returns to the Fund. In order to foster this diversity, the Fund assets are divided into five asset classes: Public Equity, Fixed Income, Private Equity, Real Estate, and the Opportunity Fund. Today, we will discuss the Public Equity asset class.

Public Equity, or Equity, is PERA’s largest investment asset class, with over $26 billion under management (as of April 28, 2017). This accounts for 57.6 percent of total Fund assets, within the 47 percent to 59 percent asset allocation range established by PERA’s Board. Such a significant allocation requires the Equities team, under the direction of the Director of Equities, to manage a diversified group of stocks in order to limit the risk of any one holding, while earning the long-term financial reward for holding stocks.

The Equities team achieves this diversified investment return in two ways: by the selection of the equity benchmark and through the employment of varied investment strategies. First, the benchmark for PERA Equities, selected by PERA’s Board, is the MSCI All Country World Investable Market Index (ACWI IMI). This index includes thousands of stocks across the globe, covers various sectors and industries, and encompasses companies of all sizes (large, medium, and small). The “All Country” nature of the index means that the index includes stocks from both developed economies, like the U.S. and Western Europe, and emerging economies, like Eastern Europe, China, and Brazil. As such, this diversified benchmark covers the broad spectrum of the global equity market.

With a diversified benchmark established for Equities, the structure of the Equities portfolio takes advantage of this broad stock universe to achieve a strong return with reasonable risk. The Equities team employs a combination for active strategies, which attempt to exceed benchmark returns, and passive strategies, which seek to provide benchmark returns. This blend can be considered a “core/satellite” approach, where the core passive index return is augmented by the satellite active management returns.

To execute this approach, the Equities Division employs 15 people, led by the Director. The 14 investment professionals on the team have earned the right to use the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation, and eight of the 14 have advanced degrees. The average investment experience of the team members is 15 years, making this a very experienced group of portfolio managers, analysts, and traders.

On the internal active management side, representing about 35 percent of PERA Equity assets, 12 portfolio managers and analysts manage five separate portfolios. These portfolios cover various regions and sizes of the equity market (for example, U.S., global, large, and small cap). Each portfolio is managed by a three-person portfolio manager team. The multiple portfolio manager structure allows for a more balanced point-of-view, as well as improved succession planning. At the analyst level, each analyst covers one or more global sectors, potentially contributing investment ideas to any of the five active portfolios.

These investment ideas consist of the purchase of stocks deemed attractive by the analyst, based on the fundamental analysis of the issuing company’s potential, and the sale of those considered less attractive. While the analysts present the investment ideas, the portfolio management teams decide whether the idea is appropriate for a given portfolio. In this vein, the portfolio managers assess how a new stock position will affect the risk of the portfolio, in addition to the sector, industry, and country exposures. Each portfolio has a designated benchmark index and active risk target, which indicates how far a portfolio can diverge from its benchmark, and the portfolio managers take this active risk into account when considering an analyst’s investment ideas.

Another 35 percent of the Equities group assets are managed internally, but on a passive basis. This means that the portfolios are managed with an eye toward meeting, not beating, the designated benchmark’s returns. At PERA, two passive portfolio managers manage three accounts, which cover U.S. and non-U.S. Developed markets across all market capitalization segments. Using sophisticated quantitative tools and techniques, while adhering to various risk constraints and holdings restrictions, these portfolio managers strive to match the benchmark index return while keeping transaction costs to a minimum.

With 70 percent of the Equity assets managed internally by staff, PERA’s preference for internal management is quite clear. Given the economies of scale associated with the amount PERA manages internally, the Equities team can provide both active and passive management at a lower cost than the external alternatives. PERA has access to top investment talent, providing all of its portfolios the chance to meet their objectives, whether active or passive. PERA also has an experienced trading team, which doubles as the passive portfolio management team, to execute all its equity and currency trades.

PERA Equities has several competitive advantages, contributing to its long-term success. PERA’s low-cost internal management advantage, due to economies of scale and direct access to investment talent, has already been highlighted. PERA also benefits from its perpetual investment time horizon, allowing PERA investment professionals to capitalize on market dislocations as patient capital, potentially providing liquidity to other market participants with shorter investment time horizons. This longer-term perspective fosters a low-turnover approach, which not only lowers transaction costs, but also allows PERA’s investment managers to develop medium- to long-term views on companies they anticipate to be winners, rather than react to short-term “noise.”

In addition, PERA and its Equities staff recognize the benefit of employing some external managers. External managers offer unique perspectives and often utilize different strategies than employed in PERA’s internal portfolio management process, thus offering the opportunity to diversify the return to the overall Equity asset class. Beyond the actual returns provided by these active managers, PERA’s Equities team can leverage these managers’ expertise and company contacts for idea generation, investment theme discussion, and portfolio risk considerations. This is a significant information advantage that PERA can use as both an investment manager and client. That said, external management comes at a cost, and the Equities team uses larger mandates to lower fees (because external managers offer lower fees to larger clients), thus accessing external expertise at a reasonable expense.

The Equities team utilizes all the tools at its disposal to form a low cost and well-diversified portfolio of stocks that outperforms the benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis over long time periods. With broad access to investment acumen, both internally and externally, the PERA Equities team is well suited to meet it strategic objective. This objective, to manage public equities to meet or exceed benchmark performance while adhering to investment guidelines and risk parameters, is designed to help the overall PERA Fund deliver the necessary investment results for its members.

Useful links to details on the PERA investment program:

Glossary of Investment Terms

Investment Frequently Asked Questions

Colorado PERA Statement of Investment Policy

Retirement Roundup: You May Not Be Ready to Retire

A digest of timely information and insight about finance, investing, and retirement.

5 signs you’re not ready to retire (even if you think you are) | The Motley Fool
Retiring early can have major consequences, and most people underestimate how much they’ll actually need to live comfortably. According to the latest Retirement Confidence Survey by the Employee Benefit Research Institute, 63 percent of workers are at least somewhat confident that they have enough money to last through retirement, yet the average 401(k) account balance as of 2016 is just $96,000, or enough to provide $3,200 in annual income over a 30-year retirement. Before getting too excited about the prospect of early retirement, consider five different situations that could indicate it’s not worth the risk to retire now.

Would you trust Tom Selleck with your life savings? | The New York Times
Choosing the perfect celebrity spokesman or spokeswoman for cars, coffee machines, soft drinks or cellphone service providers is a tricky business. But it can’t compete with the challenge of coming up with the right big name to pitch products at retirees. After all, when the discussion is life insurance, reverse mortgages or pharmaceuticals, the stakes are higher. Older Americans respond to boldface names who look like them, with gray or graying hair, and a few wrinkles, or more.

Pension cuts have public employees worried | PlanSponsor
While it might be assumed that public employees, such as teachers, police and firefighters, are well covered by their pensions, they worry about life in retirement, according to a survey by Prudential Retirement. Only 17 percent are very confident that they will have enough money to last them in the future.

Furthermore, according to the report, “Getting Back on Track: Financial Wellness in the Public Sector,” more than one in four said that receiving a pension plan was a significant factor that influenced their decision to pursue a career in the public sector, and nearly half say that if their pension were at risk, they might reconsider remaining in their careers.

Pre-retirement financial review is a must | Squared Away Blog
One out of three boomers in a recent Transamerica survey said they are not confident they will have enough income to retire “comfortably” and another third concede that they are only “somewhat confident.” The most important thing for baby boomers who are not wealthy is knowing how much income will come in the door every singly month to pay the bills in retirement. This is a question that a financial adviser could help to answer.

Does the average American have a 401(k)? | The Motley Fool
There’s a reason 401(k) plans are a popular choice for those looking to set aside money for the future. Not only are contributions traditionally tax-free, but because they’re deducted directly from earnings, the process of funding a 401(k) is as seamless as can be. So it may be surprising to learn that the average American does not, in fact, have a 401(k) – especially given the number of employees who have the option to participate in one.

Retirement planning: going from anxiety to Zen | NextAvenue
Louise Nayer has been retired six years and is feeling pretty Zen about it. But as she writes in Poised for Retirement, Moving From Anxiety to Zen, that’s far different from the way she felt just before she quit work at 62, a few years after her husband did. Exhausted from work, she knew she was emotionally ready. But from a financial, professional and social standpoint, she had work to do. Part memoir and part self-help manual, she recounts her journey.

Commitment to Public Service, Other Themes Guide PERAtour

The first leg of PERAtour, PERA’s statewide outreach initiative, concluded just last week.

During the inaugural leg of this two-part community engagement effort (the second phase of which will commence in the fall), PERA held 12 meetings in nine cities throughout Colorado, bringing together close to 1,000 PERA members, retirees, employers, and interested citizens in a factual dialogue about PERA’s current funded status and risk profile. The feedback gathered from these conversations, as well as ideas from policymakers and other stakeholders, will be consolidated and reviewed by the PERA Board of Trustees to inform any deliberations about changes to the PERA plan design. (If you were not able to attend an in-person meeting, there is still time to have your voice heard. Visit www.peratour.org to submit your comments, explore the issues being discussed, view a narrated version of the presentation shared at all community events, and follow the five-phase journey PERA is undertaking.)

PERA gleaned a number of valuable insights over the course of PERAtour, particularly on the principles and priorities members and retirees consider most pivotal to the PERA Board’s assessment of possible actions to take. The range of voices heard throughout the outreach effort also unveiled some central themes – communal attitudes, beliefs, perspectives – that are explored in further detail on the PERAtour site. Some of those include:

  • PERA beneficiaries demonstrate a deep commitment to public service, as well as an ability to rally together to make decisions for the greater good. As one participant in Denver put it, “People choose to work in this sector because they enjoy giving service to our state. Our beloved Colorado benefits from all of us in public service.”
  • With the shifting demographics of today’s workforce, it is more important than ever for PERA to remain attractive to a new generation of employees. One of the most important ways that participants feel PERA can engage with younger public service workers? Educate them about their retirement benefits. All too often, younger employees are simply unaware of the defined benefit plan.
  • While many of PERA’s beneficiaries have dedicated a substantial part—if not all—of their careers to public service, PERA should also benefit employees who spend less time in the system. Thanks to PERA’s hybrid defined benefit plan design, it does. (You can read more about this feature here.)

These themes reflect just some of the learnings PERA’s community outreach effort has afforded thus far. Given the significant footprint of PERA across the state, it is important for a variety of voices to be involved in the conversation about potential changes that will ensure PERA continues to be a sustainable retirement plan for Colorado’s public employees.

Financial CHOICE Act Would Repeal Dodd-Frank Provisions

Last Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to pass H.R. 10, the Financial CHOICE Act, on a 233-186 vote. This bill would repeal certain provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank legislation, which was put in place to prevent a banking collapse similar to what occurred during the 2008 financial crisis. Some of the provisions subject to repeal are those that safeguard investors’ access to information and research necessary to hold management and boards of public companies accountable.

PERA sent a letter to each member of Colorado’s federal congressional delegation urging a no vote on the legislation.

The bill now heads to the Senate.

Rep. Scott Tipton (R-CO-03) is a cosponsor of the legislation.

For further details on H.R. 10, read the letter PERA sent to Representatives DeGette, Polis, Tipton, Buck, Lamborn, Coffman, and Perlmutter here.

Retirement Roundup: There’s More to Retirement Than Money

8 things that matter more than money for a happy retirement  | U.S. News & World Report
If you are facing retirement with less money than you would prefer, don’t despair. There’s a lot more to enjoying a happy retirement than simply saving enough money. True wealth and happiness come from many sources.

The monk who left the monastery to fix broken retirement plans | The New York Times
After decades as a committed seeker, Doug Lynam has found his calling. He wants to help schools build better retirement savings plans so their teachers can leave the classroom at a time of their choosing with dignity and grace. Having worked alongside other teachers during his time at a monastery, he found that 403(b) plans – like 401(k) s for nonprofits and educational institutions – might offer poor investment choices, high fees and abusive annuities. He now works to provide a better option.

Your money: Creative caregiving solutions for the ‘sandwich generation’ | Reuters
Stretched thin by the needs of their children and elderly parents, some in the “sandwich generation” have found a possible solution: Move young adults in with their grandparents and let them take care of each other.

Here are all the financial reforms that will disappear with Dodd-Frank | Forbes
On June 8, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Financial CHOICE Act, a reform effort aimed at rolling back the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, enacted under President Barack Obama. Dodd Frank was a re-write of U.S. financial laws in the wake of the financial crisis, which altered everything from the trading of stocks and bonds to the way in which large banks are regulated. President Trump, however, believes regulations are slowing the U.S. economy.

How much long-term care do adult children provide? | Center for Retirement Research at Boston College
As people age and their health deteriorates, the cost concerns, along with personal preferences, lead many to rely on informal care from their adult children rather than formal long-term care services. Research from the Center for Retirement Research found that at any given point, 6 percent of adult children serve as caregivers, and 17 percent will take on this role at some point in their lives – something that can take a toll on both the finances and health of the caregiver.

A new rule on retirement savings advice is in your best interest | The Washington Post
After a long battle, which still may not be over, investors are about to get some major help in determining which financial advisers are working in their best interest. The fiduciary rule that went into effect on June 9 will give retirement savers some common-sense protection that should bring to light conflicts of interest that could cost them dearly.