PERA continues to be one of Colorado’s best investments pumping more than $5 billion into Colorado’s economy. “Our distribution of retirement dollars to those who spent careers teaching our children, keeping our roads safe, maintaining our wilderness areas, and helping to build strong communities means that PERA works for Colorado’s small businesses where our economic impact is felt in local communities throughout the entire state of Colorado,” said Colorado PERA Executive Director Gregory W. Smith. “At PERA, we work for our members and retirees to ensure they have a foundation for the future that includes a secure and stable retirement.” Read more here.
Month: June 2015
Biggest Challenge Governments Face Is Infrastructure, Not Pensions
Despite a widespread belief among government officials that public pensions are the biggest fiscal challenge facing states and local governments, infrastructure needs are actually a greater concern. That’s the argument Mark Funkhouser makes in “Why the Fiscal Issue That Matters Most Isn’t Pensions” in the June issue of Governing magazine.
Infrastructure needs are more significant than pension challenges in three ways:
- An estimate of the country’s infrastructure deficit ($3.6 trillion) is larger than state and local governments’ defined-benefit pension underfunding (between $2 and $3 trillion).
- Infrastructure issues are pervasive from the Southwest to Northeast and everywhere in between, while many pension plans are well-funded.
- The consequences of failing infrastructure are dire, including loss of life, property and economic competiveness.
Policymakers may be overly concerned about pension funding in part because criticizing pensions fits with an ideological agenda. Cutting pension benefits and shifting payments from employers to employees may also be easier than finding new money for infrastructure spending, Funkhouser suggests.
As Funkhouser concludes, “The issues confronting pensions, while not trivial, are manageable. But…you cannot repeal the laws of physics.”
Retirement Roundup: Something Very Significant Just Happened to 401(k) Plans
A digest of timely information and insight about finance, investing and retirement.
Something Very Significant Just Happened to 401(k) Plans | Time
Withdrawals from 401(k) plans are now exceeding contributions, according to data cited by the Wall Street Journal. While baby boomers are retiring, younger workers are incapable or less interested in saving for retirement.
Most Americans unaware of 401(k) fees | BenefitsPro
Research from the National Association of Retirement Plan Participants shows that 58 percent of working Americans don’t realize they are paying fees for workplace retirement savings plans. Of those who do know, most don’t know how much the fees cost.
Many Americans have no retirement savings: Federal Reserve study | The Economic Times
Nearly a third of working Americans have neither a pension nor retirement savings, according to the 2014 Survey of Household Economics and Decision-Making, published by the Federal Reserve.
Americans Prioritize Short-Term Finances Over Distant Needs | PlanSponsor
Americans at all ages and income levels are shortsighted about their finances, according to a study from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Even the wealthiest Americans favor short-term measures of financial fitness over longer-term measures. Findings suggest that retirement savings should be easy and automatic.
Can 401(k) Plans Be Improved? | The Atlantic
Americans often don’t save enough in their 401(k) plans and use the money that they do save too early, setting themselves up for financial failure. Low-income workers who may dip into 401(k) savings out of need are particularly at risk, exacerbating inequality, according to a study from the National Council on Public Employee Retirement Systems (NCPERS). Other countries have far less lenient defined-contribution rules.
Colorado PERA Drives $5.2 Billion in Economic Output and Helps Sustain 29,000 Jobs
Distributions from Colorado PERA translate to $5.2 billion in economic output and help to sustain more than 29,000 Colorado jobs annually, amounting to 1.2 percent of Colorado’s gross domestic product.
PERA distributions, a sustainable source of reliable, predictable income for not just PERA retirees but for communities across Colorado, add critical value and stimulus to the Colorado economy. That’s according to a new report released by Colorado PERA, “Colorado PERA Economic and Fiscal Impacts.”
The report, prepared by economic and business analysis firm Pacey Economics, shows that the $3.51 billion paid in PERA distributions to more than 90,000 Colorado residents has a dramatic benefit to local economies in every corner of the state, from Metro Denver to the Southwest Mountains to the Eastern Plains.
With those distributions going to PERA retirees as well as disabled members or survivors upon a member’s death, dollars are pumped back into the economy, whether it is for purchasing groceries, buying clothes or paying for gas.
PERA distributions create “an infusion of income into the local economy that creates a chain of economic activities whose total impact is greater than the initial retirement distribution payment. The impact of the PERA retirement distributions reaches well beyond those who receive the initial retirement distributions (retirees or survivors),” according to the report.
Regular and predictable monthly distribution payments are an important source of financial stability across Colorado, providing an “automatic stabilizing effect” for the economy at every level, which is especially critical as the state works to recover from an economic downturn. These distributions are especially critical in rural areas of the state that have been slower to recover than have communities along the Front Range.
Households with stable incomes, such as those receiving a regular PERA distribution, spend their money on basic needs and other purchases as well as paying taxes and fees that provide revenue for state and local governments.
That chain of economic activity – of buying groceries from a store, for example, that then pays its employees who in turn spend their income on gas to get to work – is known as the “multiplier effect.”
Money from PERA distributions ripples through the economy, and for every dollar spent by a PERA recipient, an additional 48 cents is generated through additional rounds of spending.
Colorado’s state and local governments see a total impact of $267 million in revenue from tax payments that result from PERA distributions to retired teachers, snowplow drivers, game wardens and other public workers. These tax payments continue to be directed to paying for our schools, roads, and other community services.
Recipients pay income taxes in addition to taxes on goods and services, such as sales, use and property taxes as well as government fees, licenses and permits. Their spending generates the multiplier effect, which in turn results in another layer of taxes and fees. The report measures fiscal impact, including income and property taxes on that first round of spending as well as other taxes and fees paid on subsequent rounds of spending. That spending generates revenue for state and local government budgets.
In total, the report shows that $3.5 billion in annual PERA distributions to Colorado residents drives:
- $5.2 billion in economic output (all goods and services transactions);
- $2.52 billion in value-added, or state gross domestic product;
- $1.46 billion in labor income (worker impact in Colorado measured in wages); and
- 29,357 jobs.
The report notes further that the economic impact of PERA distributions increased nearly $2 billion since 2009, “substantially adding to the recovery of the state and local economies from the recent recession.”
Retirement Roundup: Pension Program Changes Hurt Economy
A digest of timely information and insight about finance, investing and retirement.
States Tackle America’s Retirement-Savings Shortfall | Total Return Blog, Wall Street Journal
State legislatures across the nation are looking for ways to encourage more Americans to save for retirement, in hopes of avoiding public assistance down the road for retirees with insufficient savings. With more than half of working Americans having no retirement coverage at work, the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College “calculates that 53% of working-age households are at risk of being unable to maintain their pre-retirement standard of living” in retirement.
Generation X Most at Risk Financially | PlanSponsor
As a generation, Gen Xers (ages 35 to 49) have the poorest financial habits according to a new study of Americans that looked at financial planning and savings. With more “spenders” than “savers” compared to other generations, 37 percent of Gen X adults “do not at all feel financially secure” and 18 percent believe they will never retire.
Rewriting the American Dream | Squared Away Blog, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College
Having enough money in the bank to retire is the top indicator of financial success, according to 28 percent of U.S. adults in a survey sponsored by the American Institute of CPAs. Sending kids to college without having to borrow to pay for it was second (23 percent) with homeownership and upward mobility each a distant third (11 percent).
Pension program changes hurt economy, NCPERS report warns | Pensions & Investments
Shifting from defined benefit to defined contribution plans and other pension program changes might be widening the income gap and hindering economic growth, according to a new report from the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems.