Planning for Success: Simplifying Asset Allocation for Participant-Directed Plans

One of the key factors in long-term investing success is maintaining an investment portfolio with a diverse array of assets. Known as asset allocation, this strategy helps to protect against market fluctuations from any single investment and to capitalize on positive returns.

Defined benefit (DB) plan, or pension-type, investors such as Colorado PERA generally have a very long-term time horizon for managing most investments. As a result, long-term investors like PERA are able to structure investment portfolios by determining a core asset allocation strategy to both achieve their investment goals, such as growing wealth or preserving liquidity to pay benefits, and to protect against risk, such as over-investment in any particular industry or class of assets.

Review PERA’s current DB Plan asset allocation.

Once an asset allocation strategy is in place, institutional investors will choose underlying investment managers to manage assets in accordance with guidelines dictated by their goals and policies. Investment decisions are made by focusing first on broad asset classes that will achieve the institution’s long-term objectives.

However, defined contribution (DC) plans, or 401(k)-type plans, have historically been structured to provide their participants with a menu of investment options. Participants choose from the various options to build personal investment portfolios.

Participants in DC plans often choose their investments based on the brand names or labels of the investment funds available within their plans. A challenge with this approach is that certain funds may not be labeled in a way that represents the actual investment objective or philosophy of the fund. In addition, participants often allocate their investments to funds with which they are familiar, without regard to the investment objectives and philosophy of the fund. This approach to long-term investing may not produce optimal results.

In an effort to aid participants in the PERA Defined Contribution (PERAPlus 401[k] and 457 and PERA DC) Plans to meet their personal investment objectives and strategies, PERA has structured the investment options for its DC plans as “white label funds.” White label funds are titled based on the investment options they contain. (For example, the PERAdvantage U.S. Large Cap Fund will generally invest in large capitalization stocks in the U.S.)

According to a recent study conducted by AonHewitt and reported in PlanSponsor, among approximately 75 large employers, nearly one-quarter (24 percent) are currently using a white label approach to naming DC plan investment options.

The PERAdvantage funds are not labeled with the names of their underlying investment managers—hence the name “white label.” Using white labels helps to achieve the goal of encouraging DC plan participants to focus on the allocation of their assets rather than on a fund manager’s brand name. This white label approach also avoids promoting funds with names that may not be wholly representative of the underlying fund objectives.

PERAPlus and PERA DC Plan participants are also able to access allocation advice at no charge (via the Plan website) which incorporates the participant’s age, risk parameters, return objectives, desired retirement age, and replacement income, to help determine an appropriate allocation to the white label funds. Plan participants may also opt to have their account professionally managed for a fee of approximately $5 for every $10,000 in the account. Fees are proportionately lower for accounts with balances over $50,000.

High-quality, institutional investment managers continue to oversee the investments that comprise the generic white-label funds. In fact, because of the way the white label funds are structured, participants may have even lower investment management fees. The average total fee for funds in the PERAPlus Plan is 0.35 percent or 35 basis points. In many instances, because of the white label structure, PERA can access separately managed accounts with lower costs than if it relied solely on mutual funds. This additional institutional element is a competitive advantage for the PERAPlus Plans and directly benefits plan participants.

PERA staff, Board of Trustees, and the Board’s investment consultant are responsible for monitoring the underlying investment managers within the PERAPlus white label lineup. The consultant, along with PERA staff and the Board of Trustees, also periodically revisits the allocation to the underlying managers within each of the funds.

Ultimately, PERA’s white label funds are designed to break down the breadth and complexity of investing into the fundamental risk and return drivers for plan participants.

Not that Napa! PERA Lawyers Play Key Roles in National Public Pension Attorneys’ Association

Having nothing to do with the West Coast beverage industry, every summer, the National Association of Public Pension Attorneys (NAPPA) organizes an educational conference that is critical for all public pension plans. Created in 1987, some of the NAPPA founding members included former PERA staff and it has grown from 45 original members to its current membership of 648. Over 350 attorneys attended the 2014 NAPPA summer legal education conference.

Because public pension plans are created by state legislatures and have governmental oversight, it’s important that public pension attorneys be familiar with the latest developments in public pension law. In everything that public retirement systems do—making benefit payments, collecting contributions, administering disability, survivor, and health care programs, and the very important task of investing billions of dollars to provide secure retirement income to public employees—public pension attorneys are involved.

NAPPA’s purpose is to provide educational opportunities and informational resources for attorneys who represent public pension funds. Along with a winter seminar and a newsletter, the summer conference educates members on topics such as litigation, taxation, benefits, investments, governmental regulations, and ethics. Many state bar associations have recognized the educational value of the conference by granting continuing legal education credits to attorneys who attend NAPPA sessions. PERA’s legal team attends the NAPPA conference each summer and each attorney receives about 22 credits toward their 3-year requirement to earn 48 credits in Colorado.

PERA attorneys are highly involved in the NAPPA organization. Adam Franklin, PERA’s General Counsel, was recently elected to the Executive Board that oversees NAPPA. As a leader in the organization, Franklin will add his knowledge and broad experience to this association of national experts on all public pension fund topics. PERA’s current Executive Director, Greg Smith, attended the 2014 conference and has been an integral part of the Association for over 15 years, including serving as the President of the association from 2011 to 2012 when he was General Counsel of PERA.

During this summer’s conference, PERA Senior Staff Attorney Kim Gardner presented on a panel discussing the design of disability programs. Most importantly, she described best practices when defining what constitutes a disability and when a member is eligible for a disability retirement benefit. PERA’s disability program is set out in Colorado law at C.R.S. § 24-51-701 et seq.

A defined contribution plan break-out session led by Senior Staff Attorney Jennifer Schreck discussed the negotiation of contracts with DC plan administrators (also known as recordkeepers) and the pitfalls of administering a program that allows a member to choose between a defined contribution plan and a defined benefit plan. PERA attorneys provide advice when complications arise in the PERAChoice program because of strict deadlines required by law to make such choices.

Staff Attorney Julie Borisov participated on the panel for the Health Plan Affinity Group. Many public pension plans provide health care coverage to their retirees and must comply with “Obamacare” laws and regulations. This panel of experts provided essential information to help the attorneys in the room navigate that immense federal program.

Other topics discussed at the conference included:

  • Tax Update—The Ins and Outs of 1099-Rs, Corrections, Reviewing Your 1099-R Practices and Special 1099-R Issues
  • Online Retirement—How It’s Done and Why It’s Useful/How Do We Like Social Media
  • Current Traps for the Unwary—Alternative Investments
  • Litigating Against Your Plan Sponsors or Members: Stories from the Trenches
  • DOMA and Taxation of Domestic Partnerships
  • Strategies and Structures for Direct Investment in Real Estate
  • The Rise and Pitfalls of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) to Work
  • Investments Outside the United States

PERA staff members who attend the NAPPA summer conference benefit greatly from the wealth of knowledge and experience of other leading pension plan attorneys. And by leading sessions and participating on panels, they have the opportunity to share some of their own expertise with other organizations, ensuring that the NAPPA conferences continue to be relevant and informative for pension plans across the country.